Kerala, India – May 18, 2025 | BlogHear.com
At a time when women—especially Dalit women—were pushed to the margins of public life, one woman dared to challenge both gender and caste hierarchies. Her name was PK Rosy, and she holds the distinction of being the first female lead in Malayalam-language cinema. Yet, her name and contributions were nearly erased from history.
Nearly a century later, her story is being reclaimed, reshaped, and remembered by a new generation of artists, historians, and activists.
A Pioneer in Pre-Independence Cinema
Born as Rajamma in the early 1900s in the erstwhile kingdom of Travancore (now Kerala), Rosy came from the Pulaya community, one of the Dalit castes subjected to systemic oppression for centuries.
Despite social stigma and limited opportunities, Rosy entered local theatre, supported by her uncle, a theatre artist himself. Her performances eventually caught the attention of JC Daniel, a pioneering filmmaker searching for a lead actress for his silent film Vigathakumaran (The Lost Child).
Daniel cast Rosy in the role of Sarojini, an upper-caste woman—an act that would ultimately lead to severe public backlash. Rosy was reportedly paid ₹5 a day for her work—considered a significant sum in the 1920s.
A Backlash Rooted in Caste and Gender
The film premiered in the late 1920s. However, Rosy and her family were barred from attending the screening due to their caste. The reaction from the audience was violent.
One particular scene—where the male lead plucks a flower from Rosy’s hair and kisses it—enraged sections of the crowd. Stones were thrown at the screen, and JC Daniel was chased away from the theatre.
The consequences were swift and devastating. JC Daniel, burdened by debt and ostracized by society, never made another film. Rosy’s home was burned down, forcing her to flee her hometown.
A Life in Hiding
To avoid further persecution, Rosy left her past behind. She relocated to Nagercoil in Tamil Nadu, married an upper-caste man, and lived under the name Rajammal.
She never returned to acting or publicly acknowledged her cinematic past. Her children reportedly rejected her Dalit identity, choosing instead to embrace the upper-caste heritage of their father.
“They chose their father’s seed over their mother’s womb,” said her nephew Biju Govindan.
In 2013, a local Malayalam TV channel tracked down Rosy’s daughter, Padma, who stated she knew little of her mother’s life before marriage and confirmed she did not act afterward.
Legacy Reclaimed—Too Late?
No full copy of Vigathakumaran survives. The film reel was lost, and most of the cast and crew have long since passed. A few disputed photographs and a contested press release from 1930 are the only remaining fragments of Rosy’s cinematic legacy.
To many, Rosy’s erasure symbolizes the deep trauma of caste-based oppression. Prof. Malavika Binny of Kannur University remarked that Pulaya women were historically brutalized and dehumanized, making Rosy’s decision to enter cinema not just bold, but revolutionary.
“She prioritized survival over art—and that’s not her failure, it’s society’s,” said Mr. Govindan.
Reviving Rosy’s Memory
Today, a slow but growing movement seeks to restore Rosy’s rightful place in Indian cinema history. Tamil filmmaker Pa Ranjith has launched an annual film festival in her name, dedicated to Dalit cinema and resistance.
Several organizations have also established film societies and foundations to continue preserving her memory and educate the public about her impact.
While Rosy may have chosen to disappear for survival, her story—once silenced—is now emerging as a symbol of resistance and resilience.
For more in-depth stories on history, culture, and society, visit BlogHear.com — where unheard voices find their platform.
