By BlogHear News Team | May 13, 2025 | BlogHear.com
Los Angeles, CA — A pivotal resentencing hearing began Tuesday for Erik and Lyle Menendez, the two brothers convicted of murdering their wealthy parents in their Beverly Hills home over three decades ago, in a case that remains one of America’s most controversial and publicized criminal trials.
The long-delayed hearing is expected to span two days, during which a judge will consider whether the brothers, now in their 50s, should receive a reduced sentence that could make them eligible for parole.
The hearing is not a retrial and will not revisit the brothers’ guilt. Instead, the court will weigh new arguments focused on the brothers’ behavior during their 30 years in prison, the credibility of past abuse allegations, and evolving standards around sentencing for crimes committed by young adults.
Prosecution Maintains Original Position
Prosecutors maintain that Erik and Lyle Menendez, then 18 and 21, carried out a calculated plan to kill their parents—Jose and Kitty Menendez—in August 1989 to inherit their $14 million estate. The pair were accused of purchasing shotguns, ambushing their parents as they watched television, and then going on a spending spree in the days following the murders.
Los Angeles District Attorney Nathan Hochman strongly opposes resentencing, stating the brothers “have not demonstrated true accountability” and continue to push “a litany of lies” about the motive and nature of the killings. The DA’s office has not disclosed who they plan to call as witnesses during the hearing.
Defense to Present New Testimony
Defense attorney Mark Geragos, who has represented the Menendez brothers for years, has signaled plans to call several witnesses. These may include family members, correctional officers, and behavioral experts to speak on the brothers’ prison conduct and mental health.
On a recent episode of his podcast, Geragos said he had not yet decided whether Erik or Lyle would testify—a decision that could expose them to tough cross-examination by the prosecution.
“I know right now that I’m going to put family members on the stand,” Geragos said. “I may put behavioral scientists on the stand.”
Claims of Abuse Resurface
Since their conviction in 1996 for first-degree murder, the brothers have consistently argued that they acted out of fear, claiming they were victims of years of emotional, physical, and sexual abuse at the hands of their father, a powerful entertainment executive. Their defense claims the murders were committed in self-defense.
Many of these abuse allegations were excluded during their second trial, raising questions among supporters about the fairness of the original proceedings. Advocates for the brothers point to research on trauma and the long-term effects of abuse, particularly on young adults, as a reason for reconsideration.
Public Interest Renewed
The Menendez case has remained a source of intense public fascination, recently reignited by a Netflix true crime series that explored their abuse claims and questioned whether justice was fully served. The renewed attention has sparked debate about the ethics of life-without-parole sentences, especially for those who were young adults at the time of their crimes.
Support for resentencing has come from former Los Angeles District Attorney George Gascón, who previously expressed concern about harsh sentencing for youthful offenders. However, his successor, Hochman, has taken a far more hardline stance.
What Happens Next?
At the conclusion of the two-day hearing, the judge will decide whether Erik and Lyle Menendez should have their sentences reduced. If granted, the brothers could be eligible for parole—marking a dramatic turn in a case that has captivated and divided public opinion for more than 30 years.
The hearing is closed to the public and media and will not be televised or streamed. A ruling could come as early as later this week.
For more true crime stories, legal updates, and breaking news, visit BlogHear.com—your destination for fact-first reporting and real-time coverage.
